Tren Penelitian Keterbukaan Informasi Publik di Indonesia Sebagai Kajian Ilmu Pemerintahan: Sebuah Tinjauan Analisis Bibliometrik
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52423/neores.v4i1.41Keywords:
analisis bibliometrik, keterbukaan informasi publik, ilmu pemerintahan, informasi publikAbstract
Penelitian ini pada dasarnya dilakukan untuk mengetahui dan memberikan gambaran terkait perkembangan bidang kajian informasi publik sebagai salah satu bidang kajian ilmu pemerintahan dalam rentang waktu 15 tahun terakhir. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah tinjauan pustaka sistematis dengan menggunakan analisis bibliometrik. Analisis bibliometrik dilakukan menggunakan aplikasi Publish or Perish dan Vos Viewer dengan menganalisa 540 penelitian yang terbagi menjadi 4 kluster dan 47 topik. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan Walaupun data yang dikumpulkan berasal dari hasil penelitian sejak tahun 2008 sampai 2022 namun penelitian terkait keterbukaan informasi publik justru sangat intens dilakukan pada rentang tahun 2016 sampai 2019. Topik-topik yang dimunculkan pada dasarnya cenderung monoton artinya bisa ditafsirkan bahwa perkembangan kajian terkait keterbukaan informasi publik cenderung berputar pada topik-topik umum saja. Rekomendasi kepada peneliti selanjutnya yang ingin meneliti bidang kajian keterbukaan informasi publik bisa coba mengulas beberapa topik yang menarik dan masih jarang diteliti misalnya hubungan keterbukaan informasi publik dengan topik korupsi, Good Coorporate Governance (GCG), pemilu dan e-procurement.
References
Acedo, F. J., Barroso, C., Casanueva, C., & ... (2006). Co‐authorship in management and organizational studies: An empirical and network analysis. Journal of Management Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00625.x
Ahmad, T., Murad, M. A., Baig, M., & Hui, J. (2021). Research trends in COVID-19 vaccine: a bibliometric analysis. Human Vaccines & …. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2021.1886806
Bradford, S. (1976). Classic paper in the management of library collections sources of information on specific subjects. Collection Management, 1(3), 95–103. https://doi.org/10.1300/J105v01n03_06
Briones-Bitar, J. (2020). Rockfall research: A bibliometric analysis and future trends. Geosciences (Switzerland), 10(10), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences10100403
Callon, M., Courtial, J. P., Turner, W. A., & ... (1983). From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis. Social Science …. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901883022002003
Cobo, M. (2011). Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1382–1402. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21525
Coile, R. (1977). Lotka’s frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 28(6), 366–370. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630280610
Criado, J. I., Sandoval-Almazan, R., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2013). Government innovation through social media. Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), 319–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.10.003
Dimbleby, R., & Burton, G. (2020). More than words: An introduction to communication. taylorfrancis.com. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003060284
Eck, N. J. Van, & Waltman, L. (2019). Manual for VOSviwer version 1.6. 10. CWTS Meaningful metrics. Universiteit Leiden.
Eck, N. Van, & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics.
Fonseca, E. N. (2013). Bibliometria: teoria e prática. Bibliometria: Teoria e Prática. pesquisa.bvsalud.org.
Gil-Garcia, J. R., & Martinez-Moyano, I. J. (2007). Understanding the evolution of e-government: The influence of systems of rules on public sector dynamics. Government Information Quarterly.
Glänzel, W., & Thijs, B. (2012). Using “core documents” for detecting and labelling new emerging topics. Scientometrics.
Grunig, J. E., & Grunig, L. A. (2013). Models of public relations and communication. … in Public Relations and Communication ….
Guleria, D., & Kaur, G. (2021). Bibliometric analysis of ecopreneurship using VOSviewer and RStudio Bibliometrix, 1989–2019. Library Hi Tech. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-09-2020-0218
Harzing, A. W., & Wal, R. Van der. (2009). A Google Scholar h‐index for journals: An alternative metric to measure journal impact in economics and business. … of the American Society for …. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20953
He, Q. (1999). Knowledge discovery through co-word analysis. Graduate School of Library Information Science.
Kang, H., Kim, K., & Seong-Min, J. E. (2019). Method and device for communication. US Patent 10,228,903.
Komisi Informasi Publik Republik Indonesia. (2021). Transformasi Monitoring dan Evaluasi Keterbukaan Informasi Publik di Indonesia. Jakarta: Komisi Informasi Pusat Republik Indonesia.
Liao, H., Tang, M., Luo, L., Li, C., Chiclana, F., & Zeng, X. J. (2018). A bibliometric analysis and visualization of medical big data research. Sustainability.
Lu, K., & Wolfram, D. (2012). Measuring author research relatedness: A comparison of word‐based, topic‐based, and author cocitation approaches. Journal of the American Society for …. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22628
Matandirotya, N. R. (2021). Research trends in the field of ambient air quality monitoring and management in South Africa: A bibliometric review. Environmental Challenges. Elsevier.
Mattos, F. F., Perazzo, M. F., & ... (2021). Top 100 most‐cited papers in core dental public health journals: bibliometric analysis. … Dentistry and Oral …. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.12572
Mayr, P., & Walter, A. K. (2007). An exploratory study of Google Scholar. Online Information Review. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684520710841784
McCain, K. W. (1990). Mapping authors in intellectual space: A technical overview. Journal of the American Society for Information ….
Meijer, A. (2016). Governing the smart city: a review of the literature on smart urban governance. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(2), 392–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314564308
Mustofa, S. (2020). Hukum Keterbukaan Informasi Publik di Indonesia. books.google.com.
Orduña-Malea, E., & Costas, R. (2021). Link-based approach to study scientific software usage: The case of VOSviewer. Scientometrics. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04082-y
Otjacques, B. (2007). Interoperability of E-government information systems: Issues of identification and data sharing. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(4), 29–51. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222230403
Palmas, S., Mais, L., Mascia, M., & Vacca, A. (2021). Trend in using TiO2 nanotubes as photoelectrodes in PEC processes for wastewater treatment. Current Opinion in Electrochemistry.
Perri, Bellamy, C., Raab, C., Warren, A., & Heeney, C. (2008). Institutional shaping of interagency working: Managing tensions between collaborative working and client confidentiality. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(3), 405–434. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mul018
Shah, S. H. H., Lei, S., Ali, M., Doronin, D., & Hussain, S. T. (2019). Prosumption: bibliometric analysis using HistCite and VOSviewer. Kybernetes. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-12-2018-0696
Silalahi, U. (2004). Komunikasi Pemerintahan: Mengirim Danmenerima Informasi Tugas Dan Informasi Publik. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 3(1), 36–54.
Small, H. (1973). Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information …. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406
Sumarto, H. S. (2003). Inovasi Partisipasi Dan Good Governance, 20 Prakarsa Inovatif dan Partisipatif di Indonesia. Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Üsdiken, B. (1995). Organizational Analysis in North America and Europe: A Comparison of Co-citation Networks. Organization Studies, 16(3), 503–526. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069501600306
Yang, T. M., & Maxwell, T. A. (2011). Information-sharing in public organizations: A literature review of interpersonal, intra-organizational and inter-organizational success factors. Government Information Quarterly.
Zipf, G. K. (1949). Human Behaviour and the Principle of Minimum Effort. Cambridge, Massachusetts, Addison.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 NeoRespublica: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
NeoRespublica : Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan is licensed under a 